Young v. Highland Park, City of et al

Filing 20

ORDER granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; granting in part 16 Defendants' Motion to Compel and Extending the Deadline to serve expert reports. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ERIC YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-12780 CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, et al., Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL, GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL, AND EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO SERVE EXPERT REPORTS Before the court are cross-motions to compel. Responses have been filed to both motions, and the court conducted a hearing on the motions on February 9, 2012. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel [Dkt. # 15] is GRANTED and Defendants’ motion to compel [Dkt. # 16] is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Defendants’ counsel is DIRECTED to fully respond to Plaintiff’s outstanding discovery responses by February 23, 2012. Failure to exercise diligence in order to adequately respond to the responses will result in sanctions including, without limitation, preclusion of undisclosed evidence at trial. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2). Counsel is further DIRECTED to mutually cooperate to schedule (1) the deposition of Plaintiff to occur no sooner than seven days following service of Defendants’ discovery responses and (2) the depositions of the individual Defendants thereafter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to serve expert reports, for both parties, is EXTENDED until the close of discovery. S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: February 15, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, February 15, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\11-12780.YOUNG.Compel.chd.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?