Allegra Network LLC et al v. Cormack et al
Filing
55
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 51 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ALLEGRA NETWORK LLC and ALLEGRA
HOLDINGS LLC,
Case No. 11-13087
Plaintiffs,
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
v.
J. MICHAEL CORMACK and SHERRIE L.
CORMACK,
Defendants.
/
OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [51]
This matter comes before the Court on the magistrate judge’s December 3, 2012
report and recommendation on Defendants’ motion to dismiss and reservation of
counterclaim. (Dkt. 51.) The magistrate judge recommended denying the motion. (Id.)
The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the
pleadings. Defendants have not filed any objections. “[T]he failure to object to the
magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the
matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 24, 2012)
(citation omitted). The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation.
The Court therefore DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 37.)
1
SO ORDERED.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: January 2, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on January 2, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Carol A. Hemeyer
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?