Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District v. Kilpatrick et al
Filing
335
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MACOMB INTERCEPTOR DRAIN
DRAINAGE DISTRICT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 2:11-cv-13101
Hon. Robert H. Cleland
KWAME KILPATRICK, et al.,
Defendants,
- and CITY OF DETROIT and its DETROIT
WATER AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT,
Intervening Plaintiff,
vs.
KWAME KILPATRICK, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1.
Plaintiff Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District (“MIDDD”),
Defendant Inland Waters Pollution Control, Inc. (“Inland”) and Intervening
Plaintiff City of Detroit and its Detroit Water and Sewerage Department
(“DWSD”) (individually "a Party" and collectively "the Parties"), recognize that
some of the documents, testimony and materials that will be produced by the
2861689.1
Parties and third parties in discovery may include information which is or is
claimed to be proprietary, a trade secret or otherwise confidential research,
development, technical, commercial, or financial information. Accordingly, the
Parties wish to establish rules and procedures governing the treatment of such
information, and have conferred in good faith with respect to the terms of this
Protective Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). The production of information
which a Party or a third party contends is proprietary, a trade secret or otherwise
confidential research, development, technical, commercial or financial information
shall be governed by this Stipulated Protective Order ("Protective Order").
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), and for
good cause shown, that the following provisions shall govern the handling of
confidential information in this action:
1.
“Discovery Material.” As used in this Protective Order, the term
“Discovery Material” shall encompass all documents (including electronically
stored information), deposition testimony and exhibits, interrogatory answers,
responses to requests for admission, and any other written, recorded, transcribed or
graphic matter produced by any party (or its employees or former employees) or
third party during the discovery process in this action, any copies thereof, and
information contained therein, as well as any information accessed, downloaded or
in any way obtained by or from the Parties or any third party.
2
2861689.1
2.
“Designating Party.” As used in this Protective Order, the term
“Designating Party” shall mean any party to this action, as well as any third party
to this action (including counsel for such third party), who requests the protections
provided by this Protective Order and produces Discovery Material.
3.
Designation of Confidential Information. In producing, providing
or revealing Discovery Material, any Designating Party may designate as
“CONFIDENTIAL” the whole or any part of such discovery material which the
Designating Party deems in good faith to be proprietary, a trade secret or otherwise
confidential research, development, technical, commercial or financial information
to the extent (1) such information is not publicly known, (2) such information
cannot be ascertained from an inspection of publicly available documents,
materials or devices, (3) the Designating Party maintains such information in
confidence, and (4) the Designating Party believes that unprotected disclosure of
such information might result in economic or competitive injury. If a Designating
Party determines in good faith that Discovery Material requires protection under
the terms of this Protective Order, it shall advise the Parties of this fact, and all
copies of such Discovery Material or portions thereof shall be marked
“CONFIDENTIAL” and treated in accordance with the terms of this Protective
Order.
Discovery
Material
designated
under
this
Protective
Order
“CONFIDENTIAL” shall collectively be referred to as “Protected Information.”
3
2861689.1
as
4.
Use of Protected Information.
All documents or information
designated or marked as provided herein shall be used by the recipient solely for
the purposes of this action or the following actions: 1. In Re: City of Detroit,
Michigan, Debtor; United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan,
Southern Divisions, Chapter 9 Case #: 13-53846, Hon. Steven Rhodes; or 2.
Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District v City of Detroit; Macomb County
Circuit Court, case # 2013-002589-CZ, Hon. John Foster, and no person receiving
such Protected Information shall, directly or indirectly, use, transfer, disclose, or
communicate in any way the Protected Information to any person other than those
specified in paragraph 7 of this Order.
5.
Use of Protected Information in Depositions. The Parties shall
have the right to use Protected Information at or for the purpose of taking
depositions, subject to the terms of this Protective Order. At any deposition, upon
inquiry with regard to the content of a document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or
whenever counsel for a Party or third party deems that the answer to the question
may result in the disclosure of Protected Information, or whenever counsel for a
Party or third party deems that the answer to any question has resulted in the
disclosure of Protected Information, the deposition (or portions thereof as
described below) may be designated by the affected Party or third party as
containing Protected Information subject to the provisions of this Order. Counsel
4
2861689.1
for the affected Party or third party may direct that the question and answer calling
for the disclosure of Protected Information be transcribed separately from the
remainder of the deposition and marked “CONFIDENTIAL” as may be
appropriate. When such direction has been given, the testimony shall be disclosed
only to those individuals specified herein, and the information contained therein
shall be used only as specified herein. Counsel for the Party or third party whose
Protected Information is involved may also request that all persons not entitled
under this Protective Order to have access to the Protected Information leave the
room during the confidential portion of the deposition. Counsel for the affected
Party or third party, along with counsel for the examining party, shall endeavor to
minimize the use of the separate transcript containing the Protected Information.
Failure of such other persons to comply with a request to leave the deposition shall
constitute substantial justification for counsel to advise the witness not to answer
the question seeking the revelation of Protected Information.
Counsel must
designate portions of a deposition transcript in accordance with this Order within
twenty (20) days of receiving the transcript. Designations may be made by letter to
counsel of record. Portions of deposition transcripts so designated shall be treated
as Protected Information by the parties as set forth herein. During the twenty (20)
day period, the entire transcript shall be treated as Protected Information.
5
2861689.1
6.
Third Party Production of Protected Information. Third parties
producing Discovery Material in the course of this action may also designate
documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” subject to the same protections and constraints
as the parties to the action. A copy of this Protective Order shall be served along
with any subpoena served in connection with this action.
7.
Disclosure of Discovery Material Designated “Confidential.”
Discovery material designated “CONFIDENTIAL” and produced pursuant to this
Protective Order may be disclosed or made available only to the Court in this
action and in the actions referenced in Paragraph 4 above, and to the persons
designated below:
a)
Current employees or officers of each Party who held those
position(s) at any time after the commencement of this action;
b)
Outside counsel of record for the Parties in this action and in the
actions referenced in Paragraph 4 above (including attorneys associated with
the law firm(s) and the paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff utilized by
such counsel);
c)
Inside counsel for the Parties in this action and in the actions
referenced in Paragraph 4 above (including paralegal, clerical, and
secretarial staff utilized by such counsel);
6
2861689.1
d)
Outside experts or consultants (including their clerical and secretarial
staff) retained to assist in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this
action and in the actions referenced in Paragraph 4 above, provided that each
such expert or consultant first signs an acknowledgment in the form of
Exhibit A;
e)
Persons shown on the face of the Protected Information to have
authored or received it;
f)
Deposition or trial witnesses in this action and in the actions
referenced in Paragraph 4 above, but only for purposes of testimony in this
action, and subject to the restrictions set forth in this Order (however, no
such witness shall be given Protected Information to retain);
g)
Court reporter(s) utilized in this action and in the actions referenced in
Paragraph 4 above; and
h)
Any other person as to whom the Parties and Designating Party agree
in writing.
8.
Filing of Protected Information with the Court. Any Protected
Information that is filed with the Court by any Party, including transcripts of
depositions or portions thereof, documents produced in discovery, information
obtained from inspection of premises or things, and answers to interrogatories or
requests for admissions, exhibits and all other documents which have previous
7
2861689.1
thereto been designated hereunder, or any pleading or memorandum reproducing
or paraphrasing or containing such information, shall be filed through the Court's
ECF system only after the filing Party has marked the document as filed under
seal.
9.
Inadvertent Production. The inadvertent production or disclosure of
privileged, or otherwise protected information, documents, or other materials or the
inadvertent failure to designate information in accordance with this Protective
Order shall not constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege or protections,
including, for example, the attorney-client privilege, the work product protection,
or any protection afforded by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures. Any
inadvertent production or failure to designate may be remedied as follows:
a)
The producing Party or third party shall: (i) give written notice of the
inadvertent production to all recipients of the inadvertently produced
information, document, or other material, and (ii) state the nature of the
privilege or designate the information as “CONFIDENTIAL” information.
b)
Upon receipt of written notice of inadvertent production, all Parties or
third parties shall return inadvertently produced attorney-client privileged or
work product protected information, documents, or other materials to the
Designating Party and destroy all copies thereof.
As to Protected
Information, each Party or third party shall apply the “CONFIDENTIAL”
8
2861689.1
designation to each copy of such material, treat such information in accord
with this Protective Order, and provide the other Parties or third parties with
an acknowledgment that the recipient attempted in good faith to remedy
disclosure of such information to unauthorized persons.
10.
Information not Confidential.
The restrictions set forth in this
Protective Order shall not be construed:
a)
To preclude any Party or third party or its attorneys of record from
making use of information which was lawfully in their possession prior to
the approval by the Court of this Protective Order or production by the
producing party; or
b)
To apply to information or other materials that have been or become
part of the public domain by publication or otherwise and not due to any
unauthorized act or omission on the part of a receiving party; or
c)
To apply to information or other materials that, under law, have been
declared to be in the public domain.
11.
Challenges to Designations. Inspection or receipt by a Party or third
party of any discovery material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” hereunder shall
not constitute a concession as to the validity of such designation. If any Party
claims that the Designating Party has unreasonably or improperly designated
certain information under this Protective Order, or believes that it is necessary to
9
2861689.1
disclose designated information to persons other than those permitted by this
Protective Order, and if dispute regarding the designation cannot be resolved by
agreement, the objecting Party may make an appropriate application to the Court
requesting that the discovery material be excluded from the provisions of this
Order or be available to specified other persons. The movant shall have the
obligation of showing a good faith basis for its contention that the discovery
material should not be protected under this Order or that disclosure to persons
other than those authorized by this Order should be permitted. Thereafter the
Designating Party shall have the burden of establishing the confidential nature of
the discovery material.
12.
No Waiver or Admission of Confidentiality. This Protective Order
is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the exchange of discovery material
between the Parties and third-parties without involving the Court unnecessarily in
the process. Nothing in this Protective Order nor the production of any discovery
material under the terms of this Protective, nor any proceedings pursuant to this
Protective Order shall be deemed to have the effect of an admission or a waiver by
any Designating Party of the confidential nature of any discovery material or
altering any existing obligation of any Designating Party or the absence thereof.
Entry of this Protective Order does not preclude any Party or third party from
seeking or opposing additional protection for particular information or documents.
10
2861689.1
13.
No Waiver of Privilege. This Protective Order does not prejudice the
right of any Party or third party to oppose production of any information or
document on the ground of attorney-client privilege, work product immunity, or
any other privilege or protection provided by law.
14.
Return or Destruction of Information. Within sixty (60) days after
entry of final judgment, including any appeal, or other final dismissal of this
action, all documents and things, including transcripts of depositions or trial,
together
with
all
copies
thereof,
which
have
been
designated
as
“CONFIDENTIAL” shall be returned to the Designating Party. In lieu of returning
such designated materials as provided above, and upon approval of the Designating
Party, counsel for the receiving Party may certify in writing to counsel for the
Designating Party that the materials have been destroyed.
15.
Protective Order Survives Conclusion. This Protective Order shall
survive the conclusion of this action, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to
resolve any dispute concerning the use of information protected under this
Protective Order.
16.
No Undue Restrictions. Nothing in this Protective Order shall bar or
otherwise restrict any attorney from rendering advice to his/her client with respect
to this action and, in the course thereof, generally referring to or relying upon his
examination of documents or things produced.
11
2861689.1
SO ORDERED:
Dated: October 1, 2014
s/Robert H. Cleland
U.S. District Judge
STIPULATED AS TO FORM
AND CONTENT:
By:
/s/ Albert B. Addis
Albert B. Addis (P31084)
O’Reilly Rancilio, P.C.
Counsel for Plaintiff
12900 Hall Road, Suite 350
Sterling Heights, MI 48313
(586) 726-1000
aaddis@orlaw.com
By:
/s/ David J. Poirier________
Michael F. Jacobson (P47059)
David J. Poirier (P62928)
Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer & Weiss, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant Inland Waters
Pollution Control, Inc.
27777 Franklin Road, Suite 2500
Southfield, MI 48034
(248) 351-3000
mjacobson@jaffelaw.com
dpoirier@jaffelaw.com
By:
/s/ Jerome R. Watson________
Jerome R. Watson (P27082)
W. Mack Faison (P13274)
Irene Bruce Hathaway (P32198)
Saura J. Sahu (P69627)
Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C.
Attorneys for Intervening Plaintiffs
150 West Jefferson, Suite 2500
Detroit, MI 48226
(313) 963-6420
watson@millercanfield.com
12
2861689.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MACOMB INTERCEPTOR DRAIN
DRAINAGE DISTRICT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 2:11-cv-13101
Hon. Robert H. Cleland
KWAME KILPATRICK, et al.,
Defendants,
- and CITY OF DETROIT and its DETROIT
WATER AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT,
Intervening Plaintiff,
vs.
KWAME KILPATRICK, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, ___________________________, declare as follows:
1.
My current employer is ___________________________________.
2.
My current business address is _______________________________.
13
2861689.1
3.
I have read the terms of the Protective Order entered in the above-
captioned action and agree to comply with and be bound by the terms and
conditions of the Protective Order unless and until modified by further order of the
Court. More specifically, I will treat any Protected Information provided to me by
counsel or any Designating Party as confidential and will not disclose any such
information to anyone other than persons permitted to see such information under
the Protective Order. Further, I will not use such Protected Information for any
purpose other than in connection with this action, and will return all Protected
Information provided to me as well as those materials generated by me containing
Protected Information (along with any copies I may have made) to counsel for the
Party or third-party with which I am affiliated at the conclusion of this action.
4.
I consent to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, for purposes of enforcing this
Order.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: _____________
___________________________________
Signature
14
2861689.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?