Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District v. Kilpatrick et al

Filing 85

ORDER ADJOURNING Motion Hearings set for 11/2/2011 and 11/16/2011 re 43 Notice of Hearing on Motion, 54 Notice of Hearing on Motion. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MACOMB INTERCEPTOR DRAIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-13101 KWAME KILPATRICK, et al., Defendant. / ORDER ADJOURNING MOTION HEARINGS On July 18 , 2011, Plaintiff Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District initiated the above-captioned matter against forty defendants. Summonses were issued on July 19, 2011. To date, numerous Defendants have filed responsive pleadings or motions in lieu of responsive pleadings. Upon review of motions currently pending, it is apparent that various Defendants raise substantially similar arguments in their motions to dismiss. The interest of judicial economy and the economic interest of the parties would be better served by adjudicating substantially similar motions simultaneously. The court will herewith adjourn all scheduled motion hearings pending the service of the remaining unserved Defendants. Upon the expiration of the summonses, the court will conduct a status conference with all parties or take other organizational action. IT IS ORDERED that the November 2, 2011 and November 16, 2011 hearings are ADJOURNED. S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 24, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, October 24, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa G. Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\11-13101.KILPATRICK.Order.Adjourning.Hearings.2.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?