Polite v. Michigan Department of Corrections
Filing
5
OPINION and ORDER of Summary Dismissal Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KAREN POLITE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 11-CV-13400
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
Defendant,
/
OPINION AND ORDER OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL
Plaintiff is an inmate currently confined at the at the Huron Valley Women’s
Complex in Ypsilanti, Michigan. On August 8, 2011, Magistrate Judge R. Steven
Whalen signed an order of deficiency, which required Plaintiff to provide an application
to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs, a signed certification of her prison
trust account from an authorized jail official and a current computerized trust fund
account showing the history of the financial transactions in Plaintiff’s institutional trust
fund account for the past six months. Alternatively, the order allowed Plaintiff to pay the
$ 350.00 filing fee in full. Plaintiff was given thirty days to comply with the order.
Plaintiff provided this court with a copy of the application to proceed without
prepayment of fees at the time that she filed her complaint. However, the certification
section of the application to proceed without prepayment of fees was left blank and
unsigned by Plaintiff’s custodian or designee.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) requires a prisoner who wishes to proceed without
prepayment of fees and costs in a civil complaint in federal court to file a certified copy
of the trust fund account statement for that prisoner for the six-month period
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the
appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined. See also
McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F. 3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997).
If an inmate who does not pay the full filing fee fails to provide an affidavit of
indigency or a certified trust account statement, the district court must notify the prisoner
of the deficiency and the prisoner will then have thirty days from the date of the
deficiency order to correct the error or to pay the full filing fee. McGore v.
Wrigglesworth, 114 F. 3d at 605. If the inmate fails to comply with the district court's
directions, “[t]he district court must presume that the prisoner is not a pauper and
assess the inmate the full amount of fees.” Id. The district court must then order that
the case be dismissed for want of prosecution. Id. If the case is dismissed under these
circumstances, it is not to be reinstated to the district court's active docket despite the
subsequent payment of filing fees. Id.
In the present case, Plaintiff has failed to provide the court with a signed
certification regarding trust fund account. An uncertified trust fund account statement,
or one that lacks a signature, is insufficient to satisfy the filing requirements for
permitting a prisoner to proceed in forma pauperis under § 1915(a)(2), nor would it cure
the deficiency in this case. See Hart v. Jaukins, 99 Fed. App’x 208, 209-10 (10th Cir.
2004); see also Moore v. Vantifflin, No. 2009 WL 224548, * 1 (E.D. Mich. January 30,
2009). Plaintiff has therefore failed to correct the deficiency in this case. Accordingly,
2
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint [Dkt. # 1] is DISMISSED under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (b)(1) and (2) for failure to comply with the filing requirements
of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Because the case is being dismissed under these circumstances, the court
further ORDERS that it is not to be reinstated to the district court's active docket despite
the subsequent payment of filing fees. McGore, 114 F.3d at 605.
S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 3, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, October 3, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\11-13400.POLITE.1915.Dismissal.Defeciency.wpd
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?