Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Cuttle
ORDER GRANTING in Part and DENYING in Part re: #90 Objection, filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of Michigan Heritage Bank. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Civil Action No. 11-CV-13442
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
TIMOTHY J. CUTTLE,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S DISCOVERY ORDER
On January 16, 2013, this matter came before the Court on plaintiff’s objections
[docket entry 90] to Magistrate Judge Majzoub’s November 30, 2012, discovery order. A hearing
was held and oral argument heard. For the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED that as to plaintiff’s document request 3, plaintiff’s objections are
overruled and the magistrate judge’s order is affirmed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as to plaintiff’s document request 7, the parties are
directed to meet and confer in an attempt to pare down the request to a reasonable, manageable size.
If the parties are unable to agree as to this document request, they are to arrange for a telephone
conference with the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the parties can agree on a new discovery cutoff
date, they are to inform the Court’s case manager and obtain from her new final pretrial and trial
dates and then submit a stipulated order containing all of the new dates. If the parties cannot agree
on a new discovery cutoff date, the Court will conduct a telephone conference on March 6, 2013,
at 2:00 p.m., which plaintiff will arrange.
Dated: January 18, 2013
s/ Bernard A. Friedman
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on January 18,
2013, electronically or by U.S. mail.
s/ Michael Williams
Relief Case Manager for the Honorable
Bernard A. Friedman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?