Radakovich v. Energy Recovery, Inc.

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion Determine Claim of Privilege. (Grimes, K.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROY RADAKOVICH, as representative on behalf of former shareholders of Pump Engineering, LLC, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-13443 DISTRICT JUDGE DENISE PAGE HOOD MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON v. ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., Defendant. / ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DETERMINE (DKT. NO. 30) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to determine claim of privilege (Dkt. No. 30). Defendant responded (Dkt. No. 34), and the Court heard oral argument on May 20, 2013; Defense counsel failed to appear. For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. Defendant’s May 24th, 2010, 8:13 PM e-mail, sent from Larry Pelegrin to G.G Pique, Borja Blanco, Tom Willardson, Kevin Terrasi, Terry Sandlin, and Carolyn Bostick (LP 00057) is properly designated as privileged. None of the other documents referenced in Plaintiff’s motion (LP 00007-14, LP 0021 and LP 00057-60) will be subject to claw back; they were improperly designated as privileged. By May 27, 2013, Defendant must submit to the Court the Larry Pelegrin document that was initially produced directly to Defendant. The Court will then review that document in- camera and determine whether it must be produced to Plaintiff. The Court will not make an incamera inspection of any other disputed documents. IT IS ORDERED. s/Mark A. Randon MARK A. RANDON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: May 20, 2013 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the parties of record on this date, May 20, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Kim Grimes Acting for Eddrey Butts Acting Case Manager for Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?