Laborers Pension Trust Fund Detroit and Vicinity et al v. First Sealord Surety, Inc.
ORDER Setting Schedule for Motion for Judgment, ( Motion for Judgment due by 12/2/2011; Responses due by 12/16/2011, Replies due by 1/4/2012) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND DETROIT
AND VICINITY , et al.
Case No. 11-13464
FIRST SEALORD SURETY, INC.,
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
On November 4, 2011, the court conducted a scheduling conference with
counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant. Counsel indicated that they did not believe that
material issues of fact were in dispute, and agreed that the most efficient way to resolve
this matter is through motion practice to resolve the dispute as a matter of law. As
agreed at conference, the court will set a schedule to prepare for rendering judgment.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a motion for judgment by
December 2, 2011. Defendant shall file a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion,
by December 16, 2011. Although the response is not to be entitled “Counter-motion,”
Defendant may nonetheless argue for—and the court may grant—judgment in favor of
Defendant as a non-moving party. Fed. R. Civ. R. 56(f). Finally, any reply shall be filed
by January 4, 2012. No sur-reply is to be filed without leave of court.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 16, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, November 16, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\11-13464.FIRSTSEALORD.Motion.Schedule.jrc.2.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?