Bradford-Allen v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 21 Magistrate's Report and Recommendation on 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and giving plaintiff additional time to retain counsel as described. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CHERYL LYNN BRADFORD-ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 11-CV-13596
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
___________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 21] AND GIVING
PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL TIME TO RETAIN COUNSEL AS DESCRIBED
This matter is before the court on defendant’s unopposed motion for summary
judgment as to plaintiff Cheryl Lynn Bradford-Allen’s action for judicial review of the
denial of her Title II application for a period of disability and disability insurance
benefits. Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a report and recommendation on August 6,
2012 recommending that defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted, and
the final decision of the Commissioner be affirmed.
The court has reviewed the file, record, and magistrate judge's report and
recommendation. Objections to that report have not been filed by plaintiff within the
established time period, although plaintiff did submit a letter in which she asked for time
to retain counsel. The record reflects that plaintiff’s counsel withdrew from representing
plaintiff on February 23, 2012. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, which had
been due November 21, 2011, was given a new due date of March 30, 2012, in order to
-1-
give plaintiff time to retain new counsel. Plaintiff did not retain new counsel, and did not
file a motion for summary judgment. The record is replete with extensions of deadlines
sought by plaintiff and her complaints seeking more time to prosecute her claim.
For the reasons well-stated by Magistrate Judge Majzoub, this court accepts the
report and recommendation as follows. The Commissioner’s motion for summary
judgment seeking affirmance of the Commissioner’s final decision concluding that
plaintiff was not under a disability from January 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999, is
granted. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE at this time.
Plaintiff has 60 days from the date of this order to obtain counsel who may seek, within
the same 60 day period, to have this case reopened for the purpose of reconsidering
the grant of the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment. At the end of the 60
days, unless the court rules otherwise, this order becomes a dismissal with prejudice.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate's report and recommendation is
accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s motion for summary
judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for a period of 60 days, within which time plaintiff may retain counsel who
in turn may file a motion seeking to have the case reopened for further consideration.
Dated: September 27, 2012
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record
and on plaintiff Cheryl Lynn Bradford at 476 Angle Road,
Lapeer, MI 48446-7502 on September 27, 2012,
by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Barbara Radke
Deputy Clerk
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?