Clay v. Bergh

Filing 18

ORDER denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 17 Motion to Produce Documents. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MAURICE OAKLEY CLAY,
Petitioner,
Case No. 11-13868

v.
DAVID BERGH,
Respondent.
/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Maurice Clay moves for the production of documents and for reconsideration of
an order denying his motion to appoint counsel. He continues to “provide[] no good
reason to believe the State has withheld” documents. (Dkt. # 14.) He continues to raise
no good reason to conduct discovery. See Rule 6(a), Rules Governing Section 2254
Cases. And he identifies no defect in the order denying the motion to appoint counsel.
See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(3). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the motions for the production of documents and for
reconsideration [Dkt. # 17] are DENIED.

s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 11, 2013

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, September 11, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\11-13868.CLAY.Reconsideration.ckb.wpd

2