Bailey v. Nyloncraft, Inc.
Filing
77
ORDER Resolving motions in limine at final pretrial conference: denying 41 Motion to Strike; taking under advisement 56 Motion in Limine; denying 68 Motion to Adjourn Trial Date; denying 68 Motion to Compel (redepose plaintiff); taking u nder advisement 72 (Issue No. 1) Motion in Limine (to preclude evidence relevant to plaintiff's negligent entrustment claim) and remaining motions in limine have been resolved by the parties 72 (Issue Nos. 2-8). Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES BAILEY, as Personal Representative
of the Estate of Jane Bailey, deceased, and
ROBERT BAILEY,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 11-14199
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
vs.
NYLONCRAFT, INC.,
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDERS RESOLVING MOTIONS IN LIMINE
AT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The court conducted a final pretrial conference with counsel on August 28, 2012.
At this conference, the court denied defendant’s motion for a continuance of the trial
date (Dkt. No. 68), denied defendant’s motion to redepose plaintiff James Bailey (Dkt.
No. 68) and denied plaintiffs’ motion to strike the report of Patrick Dunleavey (Dkt. No.
41). The court has under advisement defendant’s motion to preclude replacement
services claims pursuant to recent Michigan Supreme Court decisions (Dkt. No. 56) and
Defendants’ motion to preclude evidence relevant to plaintiff’s negligent entrustment
claim (Dkt. No. 72, Issue No. 1). Remaining issues pertaining to motions in limine have
been resolved by agreement of the parties (Dkt. No. 72, Issue Nos. 2-8)
So ordered.
Dated: August 28, 2012
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
August 28, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?