Anter v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER denying 17 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHARRON S. ANTER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 11-14905
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Mag. Judge Mark A. Randon

v.
OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.
doing business as OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE
SYSTEM, and OAKWOOD HOSPITAL,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiff having filed her Motion for Protective Order, the matter having been referred to
U.S. Magistrate Judge Randon, the parties having fully briefed the issues, and the Court having
heard the argument of counsel,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order is denied. In the
event that the matter is not resolved through the private facilitation scheduled for October 30,
2012, Defendant may serve the following subpoenas:
J.C. Penney Subpoena
Provided that Plaintiff provides to Defendant her original W-2s received from J.C.
Penney from 2009 through 2011 on or before November 2, 2012, Defendant’s subpoena
will be limited to seeking a copy of Plaintiff’s personnel file. If Plaintiff is unwilling or
unable to provide the original W-2s to Defendant, the subpoena will seek documents
relating to Plaintiff’s wages, commissions, and other compensation received from or
through that company, in addition to the personnel file.

D & L Salon/Denise Lay
The scope of the document request in the D & L Salon/Denise Lay subpoena will be as
follows:
Copies of all agreements between Denise Lay/D&L Salon or the Fountains at
Franklin/Watermark and Sharron Anter; any other documents showing the terms for the
relationship between Ms. Anter and either of them; records showing payments made to
and received from Ms. Anter; records showing purchases or payments made by Ms.
Anter for expenses and/or supplies; records for tips received by Ms. Anter; and Ms.
Anter's work schedules, from January 1, 2008 to the present.
It is so Ordered.
Notice to the Parties
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the parties have a period of ten days from the date of
this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible
under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).
s/Mark A. Randon
MARK A. RANDON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: October 30, 2012
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date,
October 30, 2012, by electronic and/or first class U.S. mail.
s/Melody R. Miles
Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon
[phone]

2