Carter v. Subway Store #6319 et al

Filing 90

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Chios Enterprises, Davison & Mound Petro & Eastern Mini Mart against Plaintiff. Judgment in the amount of $ 27,157.00., Motions terminated: 89 MOTION for Judgment filed by Subway Store #45476, Subway Store #41985, Subway Store #6319. Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHNNIE LEE CARTER, Plaintiff, Case No. 11-15158 v. Honorable Patrick J. Duggan SUBWAY STORE #6319, SUBWAY STORE #41985, SUBWAY STORE #45476, JET’S PIZZA, DOMINIQUE LATRELL THOMAS, and JASMINE LASHAWN JONES, Defendants. ____________________________/ JUDGMENT Johnnie Lee Carter (“Plaintiff”) filed this pro se action pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq., alleging that Defendants Chios Enterprises, L.L.C. (captioned Subway Store #6319), Davision & Mound Petro, Inc. (captioned Subway Store #41985), and Eastern Mini Mart, Inc. (captioned Subway Store #45476) conspired to violate federal laws relating to the payment of taxes. On February 29, 2012, the Court entered an Opinion and Order dismissing the claims against these defendants. Because the Court concluded that Plaintiff filed his action in bad faith, the Court awarded these defendants their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(4), in the amount of Twenty-Seven Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars ($27,157). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Chios Enterprises, L.L.C., Davision & Mound Petro, Inc., and Eastern Mini Mart, Inc. shall recover from Plaintiff Johnnie Lee Carter the amount of Twenty-Seven Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars ($27,157). Dated: June 25, 2012 Copies to: Jonathan A. Young, Esq. Maureen Rouse-Ayoub, Esq. Joseph L. Langlois, Esq. Johnnie Lee Carter 12273 Moran Street Detroit, MI 48212 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?