Boykin, Jr. v. Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; granting 10 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CLARENCE BOYKIN, JR.,
Case No. 2:11-cv-15308
Plaintiff,
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTROMIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC., FEDERAL NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, TROTT & TROTT,
ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C., THE CITY OF
DETROIT, DAVE BING, POLICE OFFICER
LARRY DUDLEY, STATE OF MICHIGAN 36TH
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR, and B. MARTIN-CLARK,
Defendants.
______________________________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record
and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and any objections
thereto, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation. It is further ordered that Defendant MERS’s and Defendant Orlan’s
motions to dismiss, as well as Defendant FNMA’s and Defendant Trott & Trott’s
concurrences in the motions to dismiss, are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims against
these parties are DISMISSED. Furthermore, because a court dismissing a plaintiff’s
claims against moving defendants may sua sponte dismiss claims against non-moving
defendants, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants City of Detroit, Dave Bing, Larry
Dudley, State of Michigan 36th District Administrator, and B. Martin Clark are also
DISMISSED. (See R&R at 11).
SO ORDERED.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds__________________
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: July 25, 2012
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of
record on July 25, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail
s/Carol A. Hemeyer____________________
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?