BD et al v. Dazzo et al

Filing 37

ORDER denying 27 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION B.D., et. al.,, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-15347 DISTRICT JUDGE PATRICK J. DUGGAN OLGA DAZZO, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON Defendants. / ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT (DKT. NOS. 27 AND 34) AND REQUIRING ANSWER TO COMPLAINT This matter is before the Court on the Pine Rest Defendants’ motion for a more definite statement in lieu of answering Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 27). Several other defendants concur in the relief sought by the Pine Rest Defendants (Dkt. No. 34). Plaintiff filed an untimely response to the motion, which the Court in its discretion has considered. Being otherwise fully advised following oral argument on the motion and for the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that the Pine Rest Defendants’ motion and the concurrence thereto are DENIED. The Pine Rest Defendants and those defendants that concurred in their motion shall file an Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before March 28, 2012. s/Mark A. Randon MARK A. RANDON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: March 14, 2012 -1- Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, March 14, 2012, electronically and by first class mail. s/Melody R. Miles Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon (313) 234-5542 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?