Gobie v. Visteon Corporation

Filing 24

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HERBERT JOHN GOBIE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-10208 v. DISTRICT JUDGE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III VISTEON CORPORATION, MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON Defendant. / ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DKT. 16) Before the Court is Plaintiff Herbert John Gobie’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for protective order (Dkt. 16). The issue presented in Plaintiff’s motion concerns the location of Plaintiff’s deposition (Plaintiff is a resident of the United Kingdom). Having reviewed the motion, considered the argument of the parties, and otherwise being fully advised; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s deposition may proceed via video conference – at Plaintiff’s expense – if Plaintiff so chooses. Specifically, any costs related to conducting a video deposition, above and beyond what it would cost to depose Plaintiff in-person in the Eastern District of Michigan, shall be borne by Plaintiff. Alternatively, if Plaintiff does not choose to proceed with a video deposition, then he must appear for an in-person deposition in the Eastern District of Michigan. SO ORDERED. s/Mark A. Randon Mark A. Randon United States Magistrate Judge Dated: November 29, 2012 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, November 29, 2012, electronically. s/Melody R. Miles Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon (313) 234-5542

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?