Ethridge et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Incorporated et al

Filing 35

ORDER adopting 33 Report and Recommendation ; finding as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Jon Ethridge and Renee D. Ethridge, Case No. 12-10705 Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds Plaintiffs, v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., Defendants. / ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [33] This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s October 16, 2012 Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 33) The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Defendants Jon and Renee D. Ethridge have not filed any objections.1 “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citation omitted). The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court therefore GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 19.) The Court DENIES as MOOT Defendant’s previous motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 9.) SO ORDERED. 1 The Court notes that Plaintiffs filed a certificate of service on October 18, 2012. (Dkt. 34.) This certificate is for Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, which was docketed on April 9, 2012, and indicates that Plaintiffs did send a copy of its response to Defendants. (Dkt. 12.) s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: November 2, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on November 2, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Carol A. Hemeyer Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?