Does et al v. SNYDER et al
Filing
121
ORDER Directing Parties to Submit a Joint Proposed Judgment by October 12, 2015. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DOE #1-5 and MARY DOE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 12-11194
RICHARD SNYDER and COL. KRISTE ETUE,
Defendants.
/
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT A JOINT PROPOSED JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs John Doe #1-5 and Mary Doe filed a nine count First Amended
Complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Michigan’s Sex Offenders Registration
Act (“SORA”), as amended in 2011 and 2013. (Dkt. #46, Pg. ID 840.) Both parties filed
Rule 52 motions for judgment on the stipulated facts and records submitted by the
parties. (See Dkt. ## 90-95.) The court resolved those motions in its March 18, 2013
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Amended Motion
to Dismiss (Dkt. # 27), its March 31, 2015 Opinion and Order Resolving Motions for
Judgment (Dkt. # 103), and its September 3, 2015 Opinion and Order Resolving
Outstanding Issues (Dkt. # 118).
It is ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to submit to the court a proposed
joint judgment by no later than October 12, 2015 consistent with the court’s
aforementioned orders. Nevertheless, the court strongly urges the parties to submit the
proposed joint judgment, if possible, by September 30, 2015. Submission of this
proposed judgement will not be considered a waiver of any objections to the court’s
orders on appeal.
S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 28, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, September 28, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\12-11194.DOE.requestproposedjudgment.jah.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?