Bormuth v. Jackson, City of et al

Filing 48

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Limit Ex Parte Communications with Court Staff. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Email of 7/25/12, # 2 Exhibit B Email of 7/28/12, # 3 Exhibit C Email of 7/28/12, # 4 Exhibit D Email of 7/30/12, # 5 Exhibit E Email of 7/30/12, # 6 Exhibit F Email of 7/30/12, # 7 Exhibit G Email of 7/30/12, # 8 Exhibit H Email of 7/30/12, # 9 Exhibit I Email of 7/31/12) (LWag)

To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject:
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Subject:

peter bormuth <[e-mail]>
lisa wagner <[e-mail]>
forbush <[e-mail]>
07/30/2012 03:28 PM
FW: Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 8 (b) (6)

Mr. Gillooly never served me before this e-mail and I would like that acknowledged by the Court.
Peter Bormuth

From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 8 (b) (6)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:25:35 -0400
not "again" Sir.
For the first time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:23:48 -0400
Subject: Re: Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 8 (b) (6)
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Our pleading is again attached.
John J. Gillooly
Garan Lucow Miller, P.C.
1000 Woodbridge Street
Detroit, MI 48207
313.446.5501--Direct
www.garanlucow.com
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, peter bormuth <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Mr. Gillooly
>
> I did not receive service of your answer so how was i supposed to know that
> you filed a response?
>
> I sent you an e-mail informing you that i had not received service and you
> did not respond to it.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
> Therefore i questioned whether you had filed an answer.
>
> I believe you are required to serve me with your filings Mr. Gillooly.
>
> Peter Bormuth
>
>> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:13:56 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 8 (b) (6)
>> From: [e-mail]
>> To: [e-mail]
>> CC: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>>
>> Sir,
>>
>> Our answer to your first amended complaint was filed on July 16, 2012.
>>
>> Please file a pleading if you have an issue with my representation of
>> my clients and stop the e-mails.
>>
>>
>> John J. Gillooly
>> Garan Lucow Miller, P.C.
>> 1000 Woodbridge Street
>> Detroit, MI 48207
>> 313.446.5501--Direct
>> www.garanlucow.com
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:36 PM, peter bormuth <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> > Ms. Wagner
>> >
>> > If Mr. Gillooly did not file an answer to my amended complaint, i
>> > believe
>> > Rule 8 (b) (6) which states: Effect of Failing to Deny. An
>> > allegation—other
>> > than one relating to the amount of damages—is admitted if a responsive
>> > pleading is required and the allegation is not denied.
>> >
>> > Is this correct? An amended complaint requires a responsive pleading.
>> >
>> > My allegations must be admitted by the Court by default.
>> >
>> > Peter Bormuth