Rudolph v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 17

ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TERESA MARIE RUDOLPH, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-11308 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on September 16, 2013 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On June 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Teresa Marie Rudolph’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ underlying cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety. Accordingly, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s June 13, 2013 Report and Recommendation (docket #16) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff’s September 7, 2012 motion for summary judgment (docket #11) is DENIED, and that Defendant’s November 19, 2012 motion for summary judgment (docket #14) is GRANTED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: September 16, 2013 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 16, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5135 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?