Rudolph v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
17
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TERESA MARIE RUDOLPH,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 12-11308
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon
v.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on
September 16, 2013
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
On June 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Teresa Marie
Rudolph’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of
Social Security’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R
& R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ underlying cross-motions for summary
judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the
Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
June 13, 2013 Report and Recommendation (docket #16) is ADOPTED as the opinion of
this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that
Plaintiff’s September 7, 2012 motion for summary judgment (docket #11) is DENIED,
and that Defendant’s November 19, 2012 motion for summary judgment (docket #14) is
GRANTED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: September 16, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or
counsel of record on September 16, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5135
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?