Diehl v. Hunter et al

Filing 29

ORDER Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation, Granting 12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Shar Macomb, Incorporated, Granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Melody Hardy, Hope Hunter - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GENE DIEHL, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-11522 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. David R. Grand United States Magistrate Judge HOPE HUNTER, MELODY HARDY, SHAR MACOMB INC., and CAROL TEACHWORTH, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 28); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT SHAR MACOMB, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 12); (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS HUNTER AND HARDY’S JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 22); and (4) DISMISSING THIS ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS On April 26, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation to Grant Defendant Shar Macomb, Inc.’s (SHAR”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and to Grant Defendants Hunter’s and Hardy’s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) and to Dismiss this action against all Defendants. (ECF No. 28, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendant SHAR’s Motion to Dismiss, GRANTS Defendants Hunter and Hardy’s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this action 1 against all Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE June 10, 2013 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 10, 2013. s/Deborah R. Tofil Deborah R. Tofil 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?