Diehl v. Hunter et al
Filing
29
ORDER Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation, Granting 12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Shar Macomb, Incorporated, Granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Melody Hardy, Hope Hunter - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GENE DIEHL,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 12-11522
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
v.
David R. Grand
United States Magistrate Judge
HOPE HUNTER, MELODY HARDY,
SHAR MACOMB INC., and CAROL
TEACHWORTH,
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER
(1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 28);
(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT SHAR MACOMB, INC.’S
MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 12);
(3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS HUNTER AND HARDY’S JOINT MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 22); and
(4) DISMISSING THIS ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
On April 26, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation
to Grant Defendant Shar Macomb, Inc.’s (SHAR”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and to Grant
Defendants Hunter’s and Hardy’s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) and to Dismiss
this action against all Defendants. (ECF No. 28, Report and Recommendation.)
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections
from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the
Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendant SHAR’s Motion to Dismiss, GRANTS
Defendants Hunter and Hardy’s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this action
1
against all Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Paul D. Borman
PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
June 10, 2013
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney
or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 10, 2013.
s/Deborah R. Tofil
Deborah R. Tofil
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?