Hutchins v. Sampson et al
ORDER adopting 38 Report and Recommendation; denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (Chubb, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
BARBARA SIMPSON, et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on December 20, 2012.
Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
United States District Chief Judge
This matter having come before the Court on the October 31, 2012 Report and
Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon, recommending that the
Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and no timely objections to the
Report and Recommendation having been filed; and the Court having reviewed and
considered Plaintiff’s Motion, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, and the entire record of this
matter and agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s Motion for preliminary
injunctive relief should be denied, and being fully advised in the premises,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation of October 31, 2012 [Dkt. # 38] be, and hereby is, ADOPTED by the
Court. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
[Dkt. # 17] is DENIED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: December 20, 2012
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or
counsel of record on December 20, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?