Hutchins v. Sampson et al

Filing 50

ORDER adopting 38 Report and Recommendation; denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (Chubb, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FIDEL HUTCHINS, Plaintiff, vs. No. 12-cv-12354 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen BARBARA SIMPSON, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on December 20, 2012. PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge This matter having come before the Court on the October 31, 2012 Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed; and the Court having reviewed and considered Plaintiff’s Motion, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, and the entire record of this matter and agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s Motion for preliminary injunctive relief should be denied, and being fully advised in the premises, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of October 31, 2012 [Dkt. # 38] be, and hereby is, ADOPTED by the Court. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. # 17] is DENIED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: December 20, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on December 20, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?