Thedford v. St. Clair Shores Police Department et al
Filing
39
ORDER denying 36 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Rahsaan L. Thedford,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 12-cv-12366
v.
Honorable Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge
St. Clair Shores Police Department,
Margaret Eidt,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [DOCKET
ENTRY NOS. 36–37]
In this civil action, pro se Plaintiff Rahsaan Thedford (“Thedford”) filed two Motions for
Appointment of Counsel. (Docket Entries No. 36–37.) In his motions, Thedford contends that he
has filed this action alleging various violations of his constitutional rights and has received
numerous documents from the Defendants, which he does not understand because he is a “layman
of law with no form of training in this particular field.” (Docket Entry No. 36, at 2; Docket Entry
No. 37, at 2.)
The Court finds that the issues have been adequately presented in the parties’ briefs and that
oral argument would not significantly aid the decision making process. See Local Rule 7.1(f)(2),
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan. The Court therefore orders that the motion will
be decided on the briefs.
There is no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in civil cases and the Court has
1
broad discretion in determining whether counsel should be appointed. Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d
1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987). Typically, the Court appoints counsel in a civil action only under
exceptional circumstances and, in any event, only after the claims have survived a dispositive
motion. There are no exceptional circumstances in this case that would warrant the appointment of
counsel at this time, and Thedford’s claims have not yet been tested by a dispositive motion.
Therefore, the Court DENIES Thedford’s request for appointment of counsel without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 13, 2013
S/ Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
U. S. District Court Judge
I hereby certify that on March 13, 2013, the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
by electronic means and upon Rahsaan L. Thedford by First Class Mail at the address below:
Rahsaan L Thedford
23693 E. Scott
Clinton Township, MI 48036
Dated: March 13, 2013
S/ J. McCoy
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?