Johnson v. Harrison
Filing
13
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Consolidate Collection of Filing Fees. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARREN JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-12543
HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS
WALTER L. HARRISON,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
CONSOLIDATE COLLECTION OF FILING FEES
On June 12, 2012, Michigan prisoner Darren Johnson filed a pro se civil rights
complaint against attorney Walter L. Harrison who represented Plaintiff at his state criminal
trial. The Court permitted Plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, but
ordered him to pay an initial partial filing fee of $14.00 and, in subsequent months, to make
monthly payments of 20% of his preceding months’s income until the entire filing fee was
paid. On August 2, 2012, the Court summarily dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b) because the complaint failed to state a plausible claim for
relief. Plaintiff subsequently moved to waive the filing fee for this action, but, on May 7,
2013, the Court denied his motion.
Now pending is Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate collection of the filing fee in this case
with two other federal civil cases for which he owes a filing fee. Plaintiff seeks to lessen
his financial obligation to the Court due to other prison expenses, such as personal items
and medical costs.
Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), a prisoner who qualifies
to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil rights action is liable for the entire filing fee and must
pay the filing fee in installments, as outlined in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).1 The PLRA “does not
allow any exemptions to the requirement that an indigent prisoner pay the filing fee over
time.” White v. Paskiewicz, 89 F. App’x 582, 584 (6th Cir. 2004). “[T]he obligation to pay
the full filing fee under § 1915(b) arises at the time a civil complaint is filed and . . . the
subsequent dismissal of the action, even if voluntary, does not negate that obligation.” In
re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 381 (6th Cir. 2002).
Furthermore, under the “per case” approach followed by a majority of courts, “a
prisoner must pay 20% of his or her monthly income towards each filing fee incurred,”
irrespective of the number of lawsuits the prisoner filed. Goodrich v. Tyree, No.08-13664,
1
Section 1915(b) reads in relevant part:
(1) [I]f a prisoner brings a civil action . . . in forma pauperis, the prisoner
shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee. The court shall
assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment of any court
fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater
of-(A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account;
or
(B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account
for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
complaint or notice of appeal.
(2) After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be
required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding
month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency having
custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the prisoner’s
account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account
exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
2
2010 WL 2572773, at *2 (E.D. Mich. June 23, 2010) (unpublished). “For example, a
prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in four cases would have 80% of his or her monthly
income collected for payment of the filing fees.” Id.
The Court concludes that it cannot merge the filing fee in this case with the filing fee
in Plaintiff’s other two cases to reduce his financial obligation to the Court from 60% of his
monthly income (20% for each of three cases) to 20%. The Court therefore DENIES
Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate collection of filing fees (Doc. No. 12, filed on July 23, 2013).
SO ORDERED.
S/Victoria A. Roberts
Victoria A. Roberts
United States District Judge
Dated: August 7, 2013
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this
document was served on the attorneys of
record and Darren Johnson by electronic
means or U.S. Mail on August 7, 2013.
S/Carol A. Pinegar
Deputy Clerk
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?