McNeely v. Krogers
Filing
5
ORDER Denying 3 Application for Appointment of Counsel filed by Tanya McNeely. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TANYA McNEELY,
Plaintiff,
Case Number 12-12608
Honorable David M. Lawson
v.
KROGERS,
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
The matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s m
otion for appointm ent of counsel.
“‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a
privilege not a right.’” Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting U.S. v.
Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)). The plain has failed to present convincing reasons
tiff
as to why this Court should exercise its discretionary power at this time.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s applicati n for appointment of counsel [dkt
o
#3] is DENIED.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Dated: June 25, 2012
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first
class U.S. mail on June 25, 2012
s/Deborah R. Tofil
DEBORAH R. TOFIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?