Payne v. State of Michigan
Filing
19
OPINION and ORDER Denying as Moot the 17 Motion to Waive the Cost of Copies. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (Loury, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOVAN PAYNE,
Petitioner,
Civil No. 2:12-CV-12874
HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
KEN ROMANOWSKI,
Respondent,
___________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
THE MOTION TO WAIVE THE COSTS OF COPIES
On January 31, 2013, this Court summarily denied the petition for writ of habeas
corpus on the ground that it had not been timely filed in compliance with the statute of
limitations contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). This Court further denied Petitioner a
certificate of appealability but granted him leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Payne v.
Romanowski, No. 2013 WL 388736 (E.D. Mich. January 31, 2013). Petitioner
subsequently filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the
Sixth Circuit. On August 22, 2013, the Sixth Circuit denied Petitioner a certificate of
appealability and dismissed his appeal. Payne v. Romanowski, No. U.S.C.A. No. 13-1246
(6th Cir. August 22, 2013). Pending before this Court is Petitioner’s motion to waive the
costs for copies of various transcripts and documents that Petitioner seeks to assist him
with his appeal. For the reasons stated below, the motion to waive costs is DENIED AS
MOOT.
1
In his motion, Petitioner asks this Court to provide him with free copies of the
transcripts and other documents from his state court trial, appeal, and post-conviction
proceedings because he claims that he needs them to assist him with the appeal of this
Court’s summary denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.
The Court will deny the motion to waive fees and costs for transcripts and other
documents. First, as a general rule, a criminal defendant has no federal constitutional
right to a transcript to prepare a post-conviction proceeding. Rickard v. Burton, 2 Fed.
Appx. 469, 470 (6th Cir. 2001)(citing to Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F. 2d 318, 319 (10th Cir.
1992); United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 325-26 (1976)). Secondly, a prisoner
is not entitled to the preparation of a free transcript merely for the purpose of searching it
for grounds for a possible application for post-conviction or habeas corpus relief. See
Lucas v. United States, 423 F. 2d 683, 684-85 (6th Cir. 1970); Watts v. State of Tenn., 603
F. Supp. 494, 495 (M.D. Tenn. 1984). Finally, and most importantly, the dismissal of
Petitioner’s appeal by the Sixth Circuit renders his request for the production of
transcripts and other documents to assist him with his appeal moot. See Bragg v. Lack,
815 F. 2d 70 (Table); 1985 WL 35938, * 1 (6th Cir. March 16, 1987).
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, the motion to waive costs of copies [Court Dkt. Entry #
17] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: August 27, 2013
s/ Victoria A. Roberts
VICTORIA A. ROBERTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
and/or pro se parties on this date, August 27, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Richard Loury for Carol Pinegar
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5232
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?