1st Avenue Funding v. Fairchild Holdings, Incorporated, et al
ORDER Denying Motion for Costs and Attorney Fees 16 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
1st AVENUE FUNDING,
Civil Action No. 12-13067
Honorable Denise Page Hood
FAIRCHILD HOLDINGS, INC., MICHAEL
L. HARMON, and REBECCA A. HARMON,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff 1st Avenue Funding’s Motion for
Costs and Attorney Fees. On July 12, 2012, Plaintiff 1st Avenue Funding (“1st
Avenue”) filed the instant action against Defendants Fairchild Holdings, Inc., Michael
L. Harmon and Rebecca A. Harmon alleging: Breach of Contract (Count I);
Fraud/Intentional Misrepresentation (Count II); Action for Accounting (Count III);
Conversion (Count IV); Disregarding Business Entity Form (Count V); and, Request
for Injunctive Relief (Count VI). A Default Judgment was entered against Defendants
on May 31, 2013.
Costs are governed by Rule 54(d) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed. R. Civ.
P. 54(d). Costs, other than attorney fees, are allowed under Rule 54(d)(1) and 28
U.S.C. § 1920 et seq. Requests for costs are to be submitted no later than 28 days
after entry of judgment to the Taxation Clerk and taxed by the Clerk’s Office pursuant
to E.D. Mich. LR 54.1 and the Bill of Costs Handbook, p. 1 (“It is the duty of the
Clerk to Tax Costs ... to tax all allowable costs.”). E.D. Mich. LR 54.1. In this case,
Plaintiff did not file a bill of costs with the Taxation Clerk as required under Local
Rule 54.1 and the Bill of Costs Handbook.
Local Rule 54.1.2 governs the filing of a motion for attorney’s fees. E.D. Mich.
LR 54.1.2. “A motion for an award of attorneys’ fees shall be supported by a
memorandum brief as to the authority of the court to make such an award ...” E.D.
Mich. LR 54.1.2(b)(italics added). The authority of a district court to make an award
of attorney’s fees is delineated in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society,
421 U.S. 240 (1975). Bunning v. Kentucky, 42 F.3d 1008, 1013 (6th Cir. 1994). The
“American Rule” is that each party, including the prevailing party, must pay his or her
own attorney’s fees. Alyeska, 421 U.S. at 247. Certain statutes provide for the award
of attorney’s fees to the prevailing party (i.e. the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§ 20001-3(b)). However, the general rule prohibiting attorney’s fee awards has never
seriously been in doubt. Alyeska, 421 U.S. at 257. In Michigan, parties to a contract
may agree that the breaching party must pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees of the other
side. Advanced Accessory Sys., LLC v. Gibbs, 71 Fed. Appx. 454, 464 (6th Cir. Jul.
16, 2003)(citing, Zeeland Farm Servs., Inc. v. JBL Enters., Inc., 219 Mich. App.
In this case, Plaintiff has not cited any provision in the agreement between
Plaintiff and Defendants which awards attorney’s fees to a non-breaching party should
there be a finding of a breach of the agreement. Plaintiff also has not cited any statute
which awards Plaintiff attorney’s fees as the prevailing party in this type of lawsuit.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Costs and Attorney Fees (Doc. No.
16) is DENIED.
s/Denise Page Hood
Denise Page Hood
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 26, 2014
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of
record on this date, March 26, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry
Case Manager, (313) 234-5165
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?