HRT Enterprises v. Detroit, City of
ORDER STAYING [DOC. 99]; GRANTING 100 Motion in Limine; GRANTING 101 Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
HRT ENTERPRISES, a Michigan
Case No. 12-13710
Hon: AVERN COHN
-vsCITY OF DETROIT, a Michigan
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
For the reasons stated on the record on July 17, 2017:
Action on defendant’s Motion for Certification Pursuant to 28 USC
§1292 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and/or Modification and Confirmation
of Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 (Doc. 99) is STAYED.
Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine Regarding Funds Paid To Tenants By
Defendant City Of Detroit In Prior Lawsuits (Doc. 100) is
Plaintiff’s Motion to Bifurcate Trial (Doc. 101) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff says the date of the “take” is January 01, 2009, i.e., the date “the
situation became stabilized.”
Plaintiff shall within thirty (30) days file a proffer of proofs that it will introduce to
support the January 01, 2009, “take” date, in separately numbered paragraphs
referencing the exhibits it will rely on, as well as a brief description of each proposed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 21, 2017
S:\LORI\CASES\HRT v. City of Detroit\Order on Pending Motions - 07-21-2017.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?