HRT Enterprises v. Detroit, City of

Filing 116

ORDER STAYING [DOC. 99]; GRANTING 100 Motion in Limine; GRANTING 101 Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HRT ENTERPRISES, a Michigan partnership, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-13710 Hon: AVERN COHN -vsCITY OF DETROIT, a Michigan municipal corporation, Defendant. / MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS I. For the reasons stated on the record on July 17, 2017: (A) Action on defendant’s Motion for Certification Pursuant to 28 USC §1292 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and/or Modification and Confirmation of Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 (Doc. 99) is STAYED. (B) Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine Regarding Funds Paid To Tenants By Defendant City Of Detroit In Prior Lawsuits (Doc. 100) is GRANTED. (C) Plaintiff’s Motion to Bifurcate Trial (Doc. 101) is GRANTED. II. Plaintiff says the date of the “take” is January 01, 2009, i.e., the date “the situation became stabilized.” III. Plaintiff shall within thirty (30) days file a proffer of proofs that it will introduce to support the January 01, 2009, “take” date, in separately numbered paragraphs referencing the exhibits it will rely on, as well as a brief description of each proposed witness’ testimony. SO ORDERED. S/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 21, 2017 S:\LORI\CASES\HRT v. City of Detroit\Order on Pending Motions - 07-21-2017.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?