Brown et al v. Hatch et al

Filing 52

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants on Count III only against Plaintiff Signed by District Judge Patrick J. Duggan. (MOre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARVIN BROWN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of MIRANDA HENRY, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-14190 v. Hon. Patrick J. Duggan DANA HATCH and STARR COMMONWEALTH, Defendants. ____________________________________/ JUDGMENT On September 20, 2012, Plaintiff Marvin Brown as the personal representative of the estate of his natural daughter Miranda Henry, brought this action on behalf of his deceased daughter against the foster parent, Defendant Dana Hatch, as well as the child placement agency, Defendant Starr Commonwealth (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of Henry’s substantive due process rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as well as violations of Michigan statutory and common law. (ECF No. 1.) On August 20, 2013, Defendant Hatch filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). (ECF No. 35.) Starr Commonwealth filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion on August 28, 2013. (ECF No. 38.) In an Opinion and Order entered on this date, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s federal § 1983 claim with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the four remaining state law claims and dismissed those counts without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Hatch and Starr Commonwealth on Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim and that Count III is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the remaining state law claims (Counts I-II, IV-V) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated: October 30, 2013 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Michael J. Rothstein, Esq. Paula A. Aylward, Esq. Cameron R. Getto, Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?