Parker v. Haase et al
Filing
10
ORDER Dismissing Amended Complaint and denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Service. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CHem)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRUCE PARKER, #593090,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-14321
HONORABLE NANCY G. EDMUNDS
v.
LINDA HAASE, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT AND
DENYING MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND SERVICE
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s amended civil rights complaint brought
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as his motions for appointment of counsel and
service, in this closed case. The Court dismissed his initial complaint for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted and denied the same motions for appointment fo
counsel and service. The Court did not retain jurisdiction over the case.
Petitioner has not moved to re-open this case or to proceed on an amended
complaint. Nonetheless, any such request would be futile. While a federal court generally
has discretion to allow amendment of a civil complaint, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), such is
not the case where, as here, the Court has already dismissed the complaint. Under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, once a judgment has been entered in a case, the filing
of an amendment is not allowed unless the judgment has been set aside or vacated. See
In re Ferro Corp. Derivative Litigation, 511 F.3d 611, 624 (6th Cir. 2008); accord Griffey v.
Lindsey, 345 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir. 2003); Pitts v. Champion, 16 F. App’x 975, 977
(10th Cir. 2001); Harris v. City of Auburn, 27 F.3d 1284, 1287 (7th Cir.1994). No such
action has occurred in this case. Moreover, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to cure a
defect in his initial pleadings, his complaint must be dismissed and his motions denied. The
Court may not permit Plaintiff to amend his complaint to defeat summary dismissal. See
Baxter v. Rose, 305 F.3d 486, 488-89 (6th Cir. 2002) (citing McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114
F.3d 601, 612 (6th Cir. 1997)); see also Clayton v. United States Dep’t. of Justice, et al.,
136 F. App’x 840, 842 (6th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the amended
complaint and DENIES the motions for appointment of counsel and service. This case is
closed. No further pleadings should be filed in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: November 2, 2012
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on November 2, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Carol A. Hemeyer
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?