Williams v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
12
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 11 Report and Recommendation, Denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jamie Rose Marie Williams, and Granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Loury, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMIE ROSE MARIE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO: 12-CV-14428
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.
The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his Report on June 24, 2013, the magistrate
judge recommended that this court deny the Plaintiff’s’ Motion for Summary Judgment [9] and
grant the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [10], therefore, the findings of the
Commissioner are affirmed. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§
636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the Report, the court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this
Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff’s’ Motion for Summary Judgment [9] is DENIED
and the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [10], is GRANTED.
DATED: July 17, 2013
1
s/ Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to
independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?