Williams v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 12

ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 11 Report and Recommendation, Denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jamie Rose Marie Williams, and Granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Loury, R)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMIE ROSE MARIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 12-CV-14428 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his Report on June 24, 2013, the magistrate judge recommended that this court deny the Plaintiff’s’ Motion for Summary Judgment [9] and grant the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [10], therefore, the findings of the Commissioner are affirmed. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1 Having reviewed the file and the Report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff’s’ Motion for Summary Judgment [9] is DENIED and the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [10], is GRANTED. DATED: July 17, 2013 1 s/ Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?