Moore v. Palmer et al

Filing 137

ORDER Denying 129 Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MAURICE MOORE, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-cv-14783 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. CARMEN PALMER et al., Defendants. _________________________________/   ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF #129) Plaintiff Maurice Moore (“Moore”) is a former inmate of the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”). On October 29, 2012, Moore filed this action in which he asserted that MDOC employees at three facilities -- Marquette Branch Prison, Michigan Reformatory, and G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility - violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated. (See Compl., ECF #1.) On November 16, 2017, Moore filed a motion to compel discovery against Defendants. (See Motion, ECF #129.) Moore specifically “seek[s] the production of (9) specific photographs in their original color format.” (Id. at Pg. ID 1224.) The Defendants filed a response to the motion to compel and attached affidavits from employees at the three correctional facilities in question – Marquette Branch Prison, Michigan Reformatory, and G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility. (See ECF #135; Aff. of Aaron Vroman (“Vroman Aff.”), ECF #135-2; Aff. of Jerry 1   Hoult (“Hoult Aff.”), ECF #135-3; Aff. of Kimberly Napier (“Napier Aff.”), ECF #135-4.) In each affidavit, the employee swears under oath that his facility does not have color versions of the photos identified by Moore. (See Vroman Aff. at ¶3, ECF #135-2 at Pg. ID 1449 (“After conducting a review of the indicated critical incident report, I have determined that there are no color photographs attached to that report.”); Hoult Aff. at ¶3, ECF #135-3 at Pg. ID 1453 (same); Napier Aff. at ¶3, ECF #135-4 at Pg. ID 1457 (same).) Moore has not presented any evidence calling the affidavits into question or indicating that the requested color photographs do, in fact, exist. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Moore’s motion to compel (ECF #129) is DENIED because the nine photographs in their original color format do not exist and therefore cannot be produced. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: January 24, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on January 24, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?