Dukarski v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for Granting 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, Denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Susan Michele Dukarski re 12 Report and Recommendation, Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Susan Michele Dukarski,
Case No. 12-14921
Commissioners of Social Security,
Honorable Sean F. Cox
ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff brought this action challenging the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s
claim for social security benefits. Thereafter, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Mona
Majzoub for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and
Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).
Thereafter, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) issued on September 9, 2013, Magistrate Judge Majzoub
recommended that this Court: 1) Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and 2) Grant
the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, affirming the findings and conclusions of
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a
matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after
being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall
make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the
magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither
party has filed objections to the R&R.
The Court hereby ADOPTS the September 9, 2013, R&R. IT IS ORDERED that
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
GRANTED and that the Commissioner’s findings and conclusions are AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: October 1, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
October 1, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?