Carr v. Booker et al
Filing
47
ORDER re 46 Objection to Report and Recommendation filed by Raymond Carr. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RAYMOND CARR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 12-15074
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff
RAYMOND BOOKER, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
On February 3, 2014, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint [dkt 44]. Later that day, however, Plaintiff filed objections to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [dkt 46].
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections and finds them deficient for two reasons. First,
Plaintiff failed to file his objections within the time period prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2)
and Eastern District Local Rule 72.1(d). The Court dismisses his objections on that basis alone.
Second, after considering the substance of Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds that the Magistrate
Judge adequately addressed the underpinnings of his objections in the Report and Recommendation.
As such, the Court sees no reason to disturb its order adopting the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: February 10, 2014
S/Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?