Morris v. Fresard et al

Filing 39

ORDER Adopting 36 Report and Recommendation re 12 Motion filed by Willie C Morris, 18 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Ryan Correctional Facility, 15 Motion to Dismiss filed by Patricia A Fresard, 21 Motion to Dismiss filed by Attorney Grievance Commission, 20 Motion to Dismiss filed by Detroit Police Department, 35 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Willie C Morris, 28 Motion to Dismiss filed by Receiving Hospital. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (Ciesla, C)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILLIE C. MORRIS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 12-15505
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
Magistrate Judge David R. Grand

v.
PATRICIA A. FRESARD, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on
August 26, 2013
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
On May 9, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court dismiss, on a variety of
grounds, the amended complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff Willie C. Morris against several
state and local governmental agencies, two government officials, a medical facility, and
two defense attorneys. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the R & R, and the
deadline for doing so has passed. Having reviewed the R & R and the underlying record,
the Court fully concurs in the thorough analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R
& R in its entirety as the ruling of this Court. Accordingly,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
May 9, 2013 Report and Recommendation (docket #36) is ADOPTED as the opinion of
this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that
Defendants’ motions to dismiss (docket #s 15, 18, 20, 21, and 28) are GRANTED, and
that Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint (docket #35) and motion to return home
pending trial (docket #12) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons
stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff’s January 11, 2013 amended complaint is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE as to the federal claims asserted in this pleading, and DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to any state law claims asserted against Defendants Perry W.
Lewis and Jennipher Colthirst.

s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: August 26, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or
counsel of record on August 26, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Julie Owens
Case Manager, [phone]

2