Schwartz

Filing 9

ORDER STRIKING Redundant 8 Brief of Appellant filed by Pamela Liggett., ( Appellee Brief due by 6/21/2013, Appellant Reply Brief due by 7/5/2013) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: ROBERT L. SCHWARTZ, Debtor. / PAMELA LIGGETT Appellant, Case Nos. v. ROBERT L. SCHWARTZ, 13-10087 13-10302 13-11100 Appellee. / ORDER STRIKING REDUNDANT BRIEFS AND SETTING PAGE LIMITS The parties agreed to consolidate their three bankruptcy appeals and to set a limit of fifty pages for each appellate brief. Their stipulation fails to specify which of the three appeals persists as the consolidated appeal, and Appellant submits a brief in each appeal. The brief contains thirty pages of analysis; a review of the brief confirms that the parties’ stipulated page limit is excessive. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall proceed only in case number 13-10087. Appellant’s appeal briefs in 13-10302 (Dkt. # 8) and in 13-11100 (Dkt. # 6) are STRICKEN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s response brief shall contain no more than thirty pages of analysis. Also, the response’s background section should contain only material facts, presented in numbered paragraphs and supported by citation to the record. The response is due by June 21, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant may submit a reply of no more than fifteen pages by July 5, 2013. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 30, 2013 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, May 30, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\13-10087.SCHWARTZ.Pages.ckb.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?