Cadez, Jr. et al v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al

Filing 15

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (Ciesla, C)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL CADEZ, JR. and
JOANNA CADEZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 13-10772

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The court held a scheduling conference during which Defendant Residential
Credit Solutions, Inc., (“Residential”) stated that it planned to file a motion to dismiss
Plaintiffs’ complaint. Thus, entering a formal scheduling order at this time is
unnecessary. Residential is DIRECTED, by June 28, 2013, to submit a letter to
Plaintiffs that explains the merits of its impending motion and seeks concurrence as
required by Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(a). Within fourteen days of
receiving Residential’s letter, Plaintiffs must inform Residential whether they concur with
the motion. If Plaintiffs do not concur, Residential may file its motion, and the typical
briefing schedule outlined in Local Rule 7.1(e) will govern. The parties may engage in
voluntary discovery throughout this process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 27, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, June 27, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carolyn Ciesla for Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

C:\Users\ciesla\Desktop\Cleland\13-10772.CADEZ.Briefing.Schedule.wpd

2