Mccormick v. Does et al

Filing 42

ORDER Adopting 41 Report and Recommendation Dismissing Jane Doe Defendants without prejudice Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROOSEVELT MCCORMICK,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO: 13-CV-11098-DT

JANE DOES, CORIZON HEALTH
CARE, INC,
Defendants.

/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING JANE DOE DEFENDANTS
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on April 1, 2014, the magistrate
judge recommended that this court dismiss the complaint against the Jane Doe defendants
without prejudice. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus
further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the Report, the court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this
Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation, the Jane Doe Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.,

S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 25, 2014

1

The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to
independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or
pro se parties on this date, April 25, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

2