ELINSKY v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
19
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 18 Report and Recommendation, 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL ELINSKY, 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of Signed by District Judge Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL ELINSKY
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 13-11113
Honorable Julian Abele Cook, Jr.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant.
ORDER
This case involves a complaint by the Plaintiff, Michael Elinsky, who, in relying upon the
authority of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), has asked this Court to review a final decision by the Defendant,
the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”). Thereafter, Elinsky
filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The
Commissioner likewise filed a motion for summary judgment. Both motions were forwarded by
the Court to Magistrate Judge Charles Binder for evaluation. In a report on January 30, 2014 the
Magistrate Judge recommended that this Court grant the Commissioner’s motion for summary
judgment. As of this date, neither party has expressed any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
report and recommendation. The period of time for filing objections having now expired, this Court
adopts the report, including the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: March 25, 2014
s/Julian Abele Cook, Jr.
JULIAN ABELE COOK, JR.
U.S. District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their
respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on March 25, 2014..
s/ Kay Doaks
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?