MITCHELL v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 13-11138
BRIAN J MITCHELL,
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff,
v.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. HLUCHANIUK
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [22] AND
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [20] AND GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [16] AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
On January 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued a Report and
Recommendation [22] that Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for
Summary Judgment [20] be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Plaintiff
Brian Mitchell’s Motion for Summary Judgment [16] be GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part. Neither party has filed any objection to the Report and
Recommendation.
The Court having reviewed the record, the Report and Recommendation [22]
of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment [20] be GRANTED in part and DENIED
in part and Plaintiff Brian Mitchell’s Motion for Summary Judgment [16] be
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED for further
proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation [22].
SO ORDERED.
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 4, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?