Franklin v. Eelnurme et al
ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's April 19, 2013 8 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 13-11329
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
KELLEY EELNORME, DOREEN
MCINNES, AND DAVITA WORLD
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
APRIL 19, 2013 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
This matter came before the Court on the magistrate judge’s April 19, 2013 report and
recommendation. (Dkt. 8.) The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the
record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the
magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the
matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 24, 2012)
(citation omitted). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge’s
recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation.
The Court therefore DENIES without PREJUDICE DaVita’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt.
The Court grants Plaintiff until July 24, 2013 to: (1) ensure DaVita is the correct
Defendant; (2) identify the individual authorized to accept service on behalf of DaVita (or
the correct Defendant); (3) indicate on the Summons the name of the individual authorized
to accept service; (4) ensure the Summons is addressed to the correct Defendant; (5)
deliver the Summons and a copy of the Complaint to the individual authorized to accept
service; and (6) file a certificate of service with the Court.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: May 22, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on May 22, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams
Acting in the Absence of Carol A. Hemeyer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?