Franklin v. Eelnurme et al
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's September 11, 2013 Report and Recommendation 26 and Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 . Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (JCur)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Merissa Franklin,
Case No. 13-11329
Plaintiff,
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
v.
DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc.,
Defendant.
/
OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [26] AND GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [23]
Before the Court is the magistrate judge’s September 11, 2013 report and
recommendation on Plaintiff Merissa Franklin’s Title VII employment retaliation and
harassment claims. The magistrate judge recommended granting Defendant DaVita’s
motion for summary judgment and dismissing those claims with prejudice. The magistrate
judge also recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s “false documentation” claim
because there is no cause of action for false documentation.
Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s
report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal,
09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citation omitted). The Court
nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The Court therefore
ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
The Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s sex
discrimination, defamation, and slander claims still remain in this case.
So ordered.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: October 11, 2013
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on October 11, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams
Case Manager
Acting in the Absence of Carol Hemeyer
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?