Franklin v. Eelnurme et al

Filing 55

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 54 Report and Recommendation, and granting defendant's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CBet)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Merissa Franklin, Case No. 13-11329 Plaintiff, Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds v. Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc., Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S NOVEMBER 13, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [54] AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [47] Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's November 13, 2014 report and recommendation [54] on Defendant's motion for summary judgment [47]. Defendant seeks summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim of gender discrimination in violation of Title VII following her termination from Defendant. This is Plaintiff's only remaining claim in this case. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. Neither party has filed objections. "[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter." Sloan v. Sumner, No. 13-12163, 2014 WL 3870627, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 7, 2014) (citation omitted). The Court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: December 4, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on December 4, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Carol J. Bethel Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?