Phillips et al v. Snyder et al
Filing
30
ORDER regarding notice of pendency of bankruptcy case and application of the automatic stay 29 . (staying and administratively closing case) Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CATHERINE PHILLIPS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:13-CV-11370
v.
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
RICHARD D. SNYDER et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF BANKRUPTCY
CASE AND APPLICATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY [DOC. 29]
On August 7, 2013, defendants filed a Notice of Pendency of Bankruptcy Case
and Application of the Automatic Stay. The Notice references the automatic stay
imposed by operation of sections 362 and 922 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§
362 and 922, as well as the order entered by the bankruptcy court on July 25, 2013,
which extended the automatic stay to include certain “State Entities” defined as “the
Governor, the State Treasurer and the members of the Loan Board . . . .” In re City of
Detroit, Michigan, Case No. 13-53846 (Bankr. E.D. Mich.); Order Pursuant to Section
105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Extending the Chapter 9 Stay to Certain (A) State
Entities, (B) Non Officer Employees and (C) Agents and Representatives of the Debtor
(“Extension Order”). Governor Snyder and Treasurer Dillon are named defendants in
the captioned matter which was filed prior to the petition date and which defendants
contend is subject to the bankruptcy court order extending the automatic stay.
Although it is not apparent that any interests of the City of Detroit bankruptcy
-1-
proceedings are implicated in the case, the plain language of the stay order would apply
to this lawsuit.
In accordance with the broadly worded Extension Order issued by the bankruptcy
court, this court will abide by the stay unless and until such time as an order issues
lifting or modifying the stay to permit the captioned matter to proceed. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings in this case are STAYED until further
order of the court.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that this case is CLOSED for
administrative and statistical purposes without prejudice because the defendants are
covered by the bankruptcy court Extension Order. This closing does not constitute a
decision on the merits.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the bankruptcy stay is removed, or a party
obtains relief from the stay, then the case may be reopened upon the motion of any
party.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party may apply to the bankruptcy court for
relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 or for relief from the Extension
Order.
So ordered.
Dated: August 22, 2013
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
August 22, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?