Johnson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#14), DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#9) AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#13) Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
RAE ANN JOHNSON,
HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#14),
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#9) AND
GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#13)
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to
Plaintiff Rae Ann Johnson’s claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, who issued a Report and Recommendation on April 22, 2014,
recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review of the parties’ briefing and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the
Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. Therefore, the Court
hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Whalen’s April 22, 2014 Report and
Recommendation [#14] as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment [#13] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#9] is
Dated: May 28, 2014
/s/ Gershwin A Drain
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
May 28, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
/s/ Tanya Bankston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?