CRS et al v. Simms et al

Filing 4

ORDER Denying 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Roger Sedlak and Dismissing Complaint and Enjoining Plaintiff from Filing Subsequent Actions without Seeking and Obtaining the Court's Leave. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROGER SEDLAK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 13-11496
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

v.
VERNAL SIMMS, et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER
Plaintiffs submitted their third pro se complaint [dkt 1] on April 2, 2013, and third application to
proceed in forma pauperis [dkt 2] on April 26, 2013. The Court previously denied Plaintiffs’ applications
to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed their pro se complaints on May 17, 2013. See Sedlak v.
Simms, No. 12-14100, 2013 WL 2155600 (E.D. Mich. May 17, 2013). Here, Plaintiffs raise the exact
claims that they did in their previous pro se complaints, and for the same reasons, the Court dismisses
Plaintiffs’ instant pro se complaint.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma
pauperis [dkt 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ pro se complaint [dkt 1] is DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are enjoined from filing subsequent actions without
seeking and obtaining the Court’s leave.
s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff
U.S. District Judge
Date: May 30, 2013