Hudgins v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 19

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for Granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, Denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MARVIN HUDGINS re 18 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

Marvin Hudgins,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-11602

Commissioner of Social Security,

Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge

Defendant.
_________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Marvin Hudgins (“Plaintiff”) brought this action challenging the
Commissioner’s unfavorable decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for a period of disability, for
disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income benefits. The matter was
referred to Magistrate Judge Charles Binder for determination of all non-dispositive motions
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B)
and (C).
Thereafter, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) issued on June 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Binder recommended that
this Court: 1) Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and 2) Grant the Commissioner’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, affirming the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner.
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a
matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after
being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall
1

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the
magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither
party has filed objections to the R&R.
The Court hereby ADOPTS the June 16, 2014, R&R. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
GRANTED and that the Commissioner’s findings and conclusions are AFFIRMED.

S/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: July 8, 2014
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July
8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Jennifer McCoy
Case Manager

2