Johnson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
23
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 21 overruling plaintiff's objections 22 ; granting defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CBet)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Betty A. Johnson,
Case No. 13-11715
Plaintiff,
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
v.
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MAY 30, 2014
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [21], OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS [22], GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [18], AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [13]
This matter came before the Court on the magistrate judge’s May 30, 2014 report and
recommendation on Plaintiff Betty Johnson’s Social Security disability and disability
insurance benefits judicial review appeal. (Dkt. 21.) The magistrate judge recommended
that the Court find Plaintiff not entitled to disability and benefits. (Id.) Plaintiff has filed
objections. (Dkt. 22.)
The Court has reviewed the objections de novo and finds no reason to depart from the
magistrate judge’s well-reasoned and thorough report and recommendation.
Being fully advised in the premises, having reviewed the pleadings, and having
conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff’s objections, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and therefore GRANTS Defendant’s motion
for summary judgment and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
So ordered.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: July 8, 2014
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on July 8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Carol J. Bethel
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?