Johnson v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 23

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 21 overruling plaintiff's objections 22 ; granting defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CBet)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Betty A. Johnson, Case No. 13-11715 Plaintiff, Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. / ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MAY 30, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [21], OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS [22], GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [18], AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [13] This matter came before the Court on the magistrate judge’s May 30, 2014 report and recommendation on Plaintiff Betty Johnson’s Social Security disability and disability insurance benefits judicial review appeal. (Dkt. 21.) The magistrate judge recommended that the Court find Plaintiff not entitled to disability and benefits. (Id.) Plaintiff has filed objections. (Dkt. 22.) The Court has reviewed the objections de novo and finds no reason to depart from the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned and thorough report and recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises, having reviewed the pleadings, and having conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff’s objections, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and therefore GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. So ordered. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: July 8, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July 8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Carol J. Bethel Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?