Moore v. Warren et al

Filing 76

ORDER Adopting 73 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 56 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jodi DeAngelo, GRANTING 52 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Pei, Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SHALECSHA MOORE,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO: 13-CV-11831-DT

MILLICENT WARREN, ET AL.,
Defendants.

/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his reports filed on November 17, 2014, the
magistrate judge recommended that this court grant Defendant DeAngelo’s Motion for Partial
Dismissal and Summary Judgment and grant Defendant’s Claire Pei’s Motion for Summary
Judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further
appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this
Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s
“Report and Recommendation”, Defendant Dr.Claire Pei’s Motion for Summary Judgment [
Dkt # 52] and Defendant Jodi DeAngelo’s Motion for Partial Dismissal and Summary
Judgment [Dkt # 56] are GRANTED.

S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to
independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Dated: February 22, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or
pro se parties on this date, February 22, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

2