Jerry v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 9

ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 8 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GIAQUETTA N. JERRY, Case No. 13-12065 Plaintiff, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [8] AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [5] Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit on May 9, 2013, seeking judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge’s denial of her application for disability benefits. On July 16, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #5], arguing that the case must be dismissed as untimely filed. On September 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon issued a Report and Recommendation [8],1 recommending that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff filed no objection to the Report and Recommendation. Indeed, Plaintiff may have abandoned the case. As 1 On April 10, 2014, this case was reassigned from Magistrate Judge Randon to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. 1 of 2 noted in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff did not appear for oral argument when instructed to do so, and her counsel informed the Court that counsel did not know Plaintiff’s whereabouts and had been unable to contact her. The Court having reviewed the record, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [8] is ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [5] is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2016 s/Arthur J. Tarnow Arthur J. Tarnow Senior United States District Judge 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?